Post edited 7:55AM – Jan-31-12 by Glenn
OK. This is merely a peeve. Sorry.
There I was, innocently referring back to an old CNBC article that someone linked me to, and this is what I read (N.B. past tense of read, sounds like red):
“It has lead [emphasis mine] to an atomization of order books. The average trade size now is £3,000 ($4,500). Ten years ago it was about £40,000,” Humphries said.
Get the lead out!
My guess is that the author has mistaken lead / led by analogy with read / read, and in confusion with the metal lead. But a high-profile news source such as CNBC? Really?