| User | Post |
|
1:45PM Mar-16-10
| corinthian
| | |
| New Member | posts 2 | |
|
|
Post edited 1:49PM – Mar-16-10 by corinthian
I just read about this on the website for the great NPR program Wait Wait, Don't Tell Me. Tribune Co. CEO Randy Michaels has issued a list of 119 words he does not want said by anchors or reporters on his radio station WGN-AM. You can read the full story at http://blogs.vocalo.org/feder/…..ords/17374
Choice bans include:
"Two to one margin” . . . “Two to one” is a ratio, not a margin. A margin is measured in points. It’s not a ratio.
5 a.m. in the morning
Close proximity
Completely destroyed, completely abolished, completely finished or any other completely redundant use
False pretenses
Shower activity
We'll be right back
I sympathize with him on reducing redundancies, but some things are a bit crazy. This is where pet peeves meet corporate power.
|
|
|
2:17PM Mar-16-10
| Glenn
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1148 | |
|
|
Post edited 2:53PM – Mar-16-10 by Glenn
Wow. Those aren't pet peeves: that's a menagerie, an abattoir, a farm, a zoo, and a circus of peeves. And you picked some of the most legitimate of the bunch.
Honestly — "all of you"; "allegations"; "incarcerated"; "officials"; "pedestrian"; "really".
Really?
My favorite is the — let's be charitable — typo:
Behind the podium (you mean lecturn) [sic]
Some brat ("spoiled brat" should be on the list) grew up and made a list. Other networks are sure to reap the reward of real talent as they flee a management that is destined to fail.
|
|
|
3:57PM Mar-16-10
| PrettyToney
| | Cambridge, MA | |
| Member | posts 7 | |
|
|
Is "close proximity" redundant because "far proximity" is contradictory?
To me, the word "close" in the phrase is meaningful because "in proximity" seems broad:
* In the same (non-tiny) room as me –> "in proximity"
* Standing a few inches from me –> "in close proximity"
BTW, "5 a.m. in the morning" totally bugs. God bless the day I can stop noticing it.
Speaking of "proximity," does anyone know whether 3+ things can be "proximal"? I usually think of "proximal" as being a vector, so when I hear of 3+ things being "proximal" I start spinning my wheels out seeking directionality.
|
|
|
4:07PM Mar-16-10
| PrettyToney
| | Cambridge, MA | |
| Member | posts 7 | |
|
|
OMG! Did you all see "Dubbaya when you mean double you"?
What if that's just the way you pronounce W???
|
|
|
4:54PM Mar-16-10
| Ron Draney
| | |
| Member | posts 464 | |
|
|
I suppose announcer will have to start enunciating more carefully when they announce web addresses: "dub-bull-yoo-dub-bull-yoo-dub-bull-yoo".
Or that can start saying "wuh-wuh-wuh" and see if he comes out with a new list.
|
|
|
10:41PM Mar-16-10
| Jackie
| | Spring Green, WI | |
| Member | posts 69 | |
|
|
I worked in radio for a number of years. The very first rule I was taught was to enunciate W very clearly, as "double U." "Dubya" or "dubbaya" was just not allowed. I always envied those on the west coast their Ks.
|
|
|
9:02AM Mar-18-10
| PrettyToney
| | Cambridge, MA | |
| Member | posts 7 | |
|
|
Ron Draney said:
I suppose announcer will have to start enunciating more carefully when they announce web addresses: "dub-bull-yoo-dub-bull-yoo-dub-bull-yoo".
Or that can start saying "wuh-wuh-wuh" and see if he comes out with a new list.
ROFL! Nice one!
I knew someone who used "dub-dub-dub," which was pretty clear but… jaRgonY.
|
|
|
9:33AM Mar-18-10
| Glenn
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1148 | |
|
|
Post edited 4:54PM – Mar-18-10 by Glenn
I use "dubs" for the www when speaking. People look up, but they get it, even if they've never heard it. I figure why waste time on something everyone ignores.
Dubs dot waywordradio dot org
|
|
|
7:32PM Mar-21-10
| Jeepien
| | |
| Member | posts 11 | |
|
|
Post edited 7:37PM – Mar-21-10 by Jeepien
I just use the term "dub-bull-yooz" (plural of W) to pronounce "www", which hurts my ears a good deal less than "dub-dub-dub".
Although it's true that the exact number isn't specified, no one so far has asked me, "Wait, now how many W's was that?"
|
|
|
9:51PM Mar-31-10
| dilettante
| | |
| Member | posts 267 | |
|
|
corinthian said:
Tribune Co. CEO Randy Michaels has issued a list of 119 words he does not want said by anchors or reporters on his radio station WGN-AM.
Just finished reading "Ambrose Bierce's Write it Right", by Jan Freeman. Michaels is following in a long and time-honored tradition of editors. Freeman mentions a number of 19th-century peevologists, including William Cullen Bryant of the New York Evening Post, who created an "Index Expurgatorius" ca. 1870.
A copy of the list can be viewed here: http://books.google.com/books?…..mp;f=false
|
|