Discussion Forum

Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Another wrong "of"
"I should of thought about it first."
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
Bob Bridges
Forum Posts: 680
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

In connection with the “American superfluous ‘of’ “, I always think of another similar mistake, “I should of done it that way”.   In the US we pronounce “have” in that position that way, but of course it must be spelled “have”, not “of”.   But people who don’t write well spell it the way they hear it (naturally enough), and then come across like pitiable ignorami, more’s the pity.

I don’t think the two “of”s are related, but I always think of them together.

Forum Posts: 537
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

“Should of” is just a misspelling of “should’ve”    

There are a lot of cases like this.   People hear “victual” and write it “vittle”, hear “voila”” and write “wahla” or hear “teat” and write it “tit”.   If dictionaries are going to include that definition of “of”, then they should define “teh” as a specific article.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: tromboniator
73 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 915

Bob Bridges: 680

Ron Draney: 670

deaconB: 537

RobertB: 476

Robert: 475

tromboniator: 437

Dick: 423

samaphore: 312

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 611

Members: 3057

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3354

Posts: 17760

Newest Members: Archena, cwcollins06, lizaellis, homerfarmsby, sglickman, bry-bry, wyobrewer, Carol K, gryphonous, GeezMcDutz

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1444, EmmettRedd: 744, Glenn: 1713, timfelten: 0