Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Cardinals tweet
A shift in the official form of reference to Cardinals? Some of the media must think so.
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2013/03/05
9:06am
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1583
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline

As it turns out, some of the Cardinals have Twitter accounts. Among them is Timothy Cardinal Dolan. Or is it Cardinal Timothy Dolan? (I know. The Twitter reference is gratuitous, but I couldn't resist the topic name.)

First, I am not Catholic. But I have been around the ecclesiastical block once or twice. Half a century ago, it was standard to refer to Cardinals as [first name] Cardinal [last name]. During this interregnum / sede vacante, I have noticed many, many official references from media with significant production values using the form Cardinal [first name, last name]. Most Catholic online reference guides retain the traditional form. Some non-Catholic actually show the non-traditional form with the traditional form as a parenthetical.

Timothy Cardinal Dolan -- archny.org
Cardinal Timothy Dolan -- NY Times
Cardinal Timothy Dolan -- Washington Times

So, what gives? Have the style guides abandoned the church's guidelines? Is the old way silly now?

2013/03/05
2:18pm
New River, AZ, USA
Member
Forum Posts: 751
Member Since:
2010/05/18
Offline

Yeah, seems the Cards have been in the media alot lately.  :)  Regardless of popular media style guides, the Catholic Church has some very specific guidelines for both titles and salutations. From the Mother Church Herself:

Address a Cardinal.

During a formal introduction, a Cardinal should be introduced as “His Eminence, (First Name) Cardinal (Last Name), Archbishop of (Location).” He should be directly addressed as “Your Eminence” or “Cardinal (Last Name)” – or, on paper, as “His Eminence, (First Name) Cardinal (Last Name), Archbishop of (Location).” Note that, as with a Patriarch, you should stand when he enters a room (until he invites you to sit) and again when he leaves it. Remove your hat in his presence, and you may kiss the sacred ring during both the greeting and the closing. If he is your own Bishop, you may kneel when kissing the ring (though bowing at the waist is also acceptable); however, do not do either if the Pope is present.

The Protocol School of Washington agrees. The recent trend in popular media (putting the "Cardinal" first) is just that. A trend. Not sanctioned by the Church or the protocol wonks in DC. The (nearly) universal format of putting the title first is what causes this error. It's an attempt to fit everything into the same mold.

Note that when the Cardinal's first name is omitted (as in "Cardinal Nolan"), then the "Cardinal" can come first.

2013/03/05
3:58pm
RobertB
Member
Forum Posts: 427
Member Since:
2012/02/20
Offline
By Ngram it seems the 'informal' form was used quite early on, then picked up again since 1960, though obviously Ngram has very little materials to work with.
 
Cardinal Thomas Wolsey,Thomas Cardinal Wolsey,Cardinal Henry Manning,Henry Edward Cardinal Manning,Henry Cardinal Manning

 

2013/03/06
8:12am
New River, AZ, USA
Member
Forum Posts: 751
Member Since:
2010/05/18
Offline
4
0

Interesting find, Robert. I wonder if that might have anything to do with the Ecumenical Council that happened around 1960? The Catholic Church changed a LOT of their canon back then. For example, the celebration of mass was translated from Latin to English. And that was just one of many changes to make aspects of the Church less formal, and more "friendly" to the common man.

But the officially sanctioned use of "Cardinal" remains on the books as described in my previous post. Not like there's never been dissent in the Church, so maybe some Catholics just opted for the more familiar sounding variation in the spirit of the Council. I do recall some older priests risked excommunication by refusing to change their mass from Latin to English.

2013/03/07
11:34pm
RobertB
Member
Forum Posts: 427
Member Since:
2012/02/20
Offline
5
0

The link to Ngram above gives different graphs sometimes.  Weird.

But it will come back to the same graph when you click Search lots of books.

2013/03/08
4:46am
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1583
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline
6
0

Thanks for the graphs. I was a little shocked that my claim about "half a century ago" seems to have been pretty much on the mark.

2013/03/08
5:33am
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1583
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline
7
0

I notice that the Protocol School of Washington link above actually lists both forms as correct:

Envelope:
His Eminence
(Given name) Cardinal (surname)
Archbishop of (place)
(Address)

or His Eminence
Cardinal (given name) (surname)
Archbishop of (place)
(Address)

2013/03/08
7:25am
New River, AZ, USA
Member
Forum Posts: 751
Member Since:
2010/05/18
Offline

Glenn said: I notice that the Protocol School of Washington link above actually lists both forms as correct

Indeed they do, but they list the Church-sanctioned "(Given name) Cardinal (surname)" first. The fact that they list the alternative form "Cardinal (given name) (surname)" at all is a reflection of their philosophy, trying to stay current with changes in usage.

For example, I'd bet the honorific "Ms." was added to this page sometime in the 60s as well.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: EmmettRedd, Dick
18 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 751

Bob Bridges: 676

Ron Draney: 621

RobertB: 427

tromboniator: 373

Robert: 362

Dick: 355

samaphore: 319

dilettante: 287

Raffee: 238

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 605

Members: 3000

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3098

Posts: 16304

Newest Members: Gilliflower, jodymask, ernestomalley, SnorePhat, vernal, ToddThompson, niamhk, JeremyAxe, NDpendent, EdnorAndrewRowe

Moderators: Grant Barrett (1420)

Administrators: Martha Barnette (828), Grant Barrett (1420), EmmettRedd (620), Glenn (1583), timfelten (0)