Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Corporations As "Who"
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2013/05/26
10:46am
danomar
Member
Forum Posts: 14
Member Since:
2009/05/25
Offline
1
0

I have a (proverbial) bone to pick with Grant and Martha. In the credits, you refer to organizations that support the show as "who." I understand the desire to make supporters feel good about supporting the show. When did it become acceptable, however, to refer to non-human things as "who" rather than "that" or perhaps "which"? It is a small but significant thing. We can argue that U.S. laws give corporations status similar to humans, but in the world of language, a human is human and that is that.

Maybe my old Warriner's is too worn, but I do not recall the word "who" being appropriate to anything other than something human.

Excuse the rant. I am better now. :-)

2013/05/28
2:21pm
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1578
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline
2
0

Glad you feel better.

Collections of people have long been used with who. Consider family. There are examples of this use for centuries.

So if you consider a corporation to be a collection of people, rather than a monolithic, soulless, parasitic entity unflinchingly fixed on raping humanity with particular malice toward the poor and disabled, it could make some sense. Both nuances exist side by side [I have paraphrased somewhat]:
Corporation

Ngram of "family who" vs "family which" Note that these numbers may be inflated with instances such as "He was the one member of his wealthy family who did not believe in charitable causes." in which it is not the "family who" but the "member … who."

2013/05/29
11:52am
RobertB
Member
Forum Posts: 427
Member Since:
2012/02/20
Offline
'Whose' is a good substitute for the proper forms that  can be painfully stilted:
Corporations whose endorsements he seeks…
Corporations the endorsements from which he seeks…
Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online:
16 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 750

Bob Bridges: 676

Ron Draney: 619

RobertB: 427

tromboniator: 370

Robert: 352

Dick: 350

samaphore: 319

dilettante: 287

Raffee: 238

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 604

Members: 2989

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3084

Posts: 16237

Newest Members: pampmap, Lisbet, holahada, Twisted2014, BMayer, pyrogue, Zednotzee, bensabio, trombone_player, jvallelunga

Moderators: Grant Barrett (1420)

Administrators: Martha Barnette (828), Grant Barrett (1420), EmmettRedd (619), Glenn (1578), timfelten (0)