Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Dancing the Can Can in Walla Walla
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2013/12/10
7:51am
deaconB
Member
Forum Posts: 296
Member Since:
2013/10/17
Online
1
0

He pursed his lips, and in a moment continued, “I’ll tell her. You tell him. Bring him in in three minutes.”   — Rex Stout (Before Midnight)

I ran across that this morning in rereading an old favorite novel.  

A couple of days ago, I read someone’s post that went something like “You can tell that that sort of politician is lying when his lips move.

 

And Andy Griffith became famous recording “What it was was football”.

 

It’s more confusing in print than it is orally.   My question is “is there a term for this kind of repeated word usage”?

 

 

2013/12/10
9:02am
dilettante
Member
Forum Posts: 287
Member Since:
2007/09/16
Offline
2
0

The “is is” form has been called “the reduplicative copula” (see http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4269).

2013/12/10
2:14pm
Bob Bridges
USA
Member
Forum Posts: 675
Member Since:
2010/08/14
Offline

In the sentence “My question is ‘is there such a term?’.”, the repeated ‘is’ is grammatically legitimate.   Likewise “What it is is football”.   But what your article names the “reduplicative copula” is a mistake that in spoken English has become so common  within the last decade or two that now I think I hear it more often than not.   You all know what I mean, right?

  “The thing is is that we should do the movie first.”

It originally came from a thoughtful pause.   “The thing is…. [the speaker stops to think, then takes up the sentence again] ….is that we should do the movie first.”   But I hear it all the time now in sentences with no pause; and I’m convinced that most people are completely unaware of doing it.   I try not to let things drive me crazy, but this one gives me trouble.

2013/12/10
9:37pm
RobertB
Member
Forum Posts: 423
Member Since:
2012/02/20
Offline

It’s easy to see this is grammatically legitimate: (How can you go wrong paraphrasing Clinton’s immortal words?)

It depends on what is is.

 

Now is this also grammatically legitimate? If not why?

It depends on what what what what what is is is is is is.

2013/12/11
1:43am
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1618
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Online
5
0

I don’t know of any term for the examples of grammatical repetition.

2013/12/13
1:01am
AARON45
New Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
2013/12/13
Offline
6
0

I will keep it in mind thanks for sharing the information.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: EmmettRedd, Glenn, Ron Draney, deaconB
1 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 792

Bob Bridges: 675

Ron Draney: 633

Robert: 439

RobertB: 423

tromboniator: 400

Dick: 397

samaphore: 312

deaconB: 296

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 608

Members: 2997

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3172

Posts: 16811

Newest Members: Nancy, aerushing, Patzer, brienne77, McInbass, dsouthern36, tjintheville, jamiecordon, Uffda, LisaS

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1425, EmmettRedd: 652, Glenn: 1617, timfelten: 0