Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Experts: Bankruptcy May Give Detroit Chance to Start Fresh
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2013/07/21
4:00am
Raffee
Iran
Member
Forum Posts: 238
Member Since:
2012/06/03
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Why shouldn’t be ‘afresh’?

2013/07/21
9:38am
Dick
Fort Worth, TX
Member
Forum Posts: 422
Member Since:
2010/10/19
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think “afresh” is proper here. “Afresh” is an adverb to describe the verb “start”, while “fresh” is an adjective.   It could be reworded to say, “… chance to have a fresh start.”   Then start has changed to a noun and the adjective,”fresh”, would describe it.

2013/07/21
12:16pm
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 475
Member Since:
2011/10/03
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
News headlines always have that clipped style. Notice they omitted the ‘a’ from ‘a chance,’ which they will not do in the main story.  
Nevertheless, ‘fresh’ is quite ok as adverb: fresh out of milk; muffins baked fresh daily.
2013/07/21
3:52pm
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1711
Member Since:
2009/03/03
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Robert gets to the point quick: fresh as an adverb works just fine. I may talk fresh and fight dirty, but Robert works hard and shoots straight. And he types fast.

There are several adverbs called “flat adverbs” for which the -ly must be or may be omitted.

Here’s a short (incomplete) list of examples: “far,” “fast,” “hard,” “slow,” “quick,” “straight,” “clean,” “close,” “deep,” and “fine”.

2013/07/22
11:25pm
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 475
Member Since:
2011/10/03
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

Robert said …  Nevertheless …

Being ticklish about clarity, I realize, belatedly, how I had used the word ‘nevertheless’ so poorly.  
 
‘Nevertheless’ is used, when properly, to reassert a point by acknowledging the existence of counterpoints that are implied elsewhere: Her presentation was dismally poor; nevertheless her ideas  deserve serious considerations.
 
In that sense the ‘nevertheless’ in my previous post was quite wrong, or at best a foggy version of, say,  ‘In any case’ or ‘Regardless.’
 
This ticklishness about words might be dismissively characterized as ‘tight-donkey‘ via translation from ancient scripture. But of what use are words if you are careless of their proper meanings let alone nuances?
Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: Robert
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 915

Bob Bridges: 680

Ron Draney: 670

deaconB: 533

RobertB: 476

Robert: 475

tromboniator: 436

Dick: 422

samaphore: 312

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 611

Members: 3057

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3351

Posts: 17749

Newest Members: gryphonous, GeezMcDutz, penn90, kellymans, targan, kitkat, Abiquiu12, SnakeEater2015, Pam, dgable@me.com

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1444, EmmettRedd: 743, Glenn: 1711, timfelten: 0