Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Experts: Bankruptcy May Give Detroit Chance to Start Fresh
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2013/07/21
4:00am
Raffee
Iran
Member
Forum Posts: 238
Member Since:
2012/06/03
Offline
1
0

Why shouldn’t be ‘afresh’?

2013/07/21
9:38am
Dick
Fort Worth, TX
Member
Forum Posts: 377
Member Since:
2010/10/19
Offline
2
0

I think “afresh” is proper here. “Afresh” is an adverb to describe the verb “start”, while “fresh” is an adjective.  It could be reworded to say, “… chance to have a fresh start.”  Then start has changed to a noun and the adjective,”fresh”, would describe it.

2013/07/21
12:16pm
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 393
Member Since:
2011/10/03
Offline
News headlines always have that clipped style.  Notice they omitted the ‘a’ from ‘a chance,’ which they will not do in the main story. 
Nevertheless, ‘fresh’  is quite ok as adverb: fresh out of milk; muffins baked fresh daily.
2013/07/21
3:52pm
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1600
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline

Robert gets to the point quick: fresh as an adverb works just fine. I may talk fresh and fight dirty, but Robert works hard and shoots straight. And he types fast.

There are several adverbs called “flat adverbs” for which the -ly must be or may be omitted.

Here’s a short (incomplete) list of examples: “far,” “fast,” “hard,” “slow,” “quick,” “straight,” “clean,” “close,” “deep,” and “fine”.

2013/07/22
11:25pm
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 393
Member Since:
2011/10/03
Offline

Robert said … Nevertheless …

Being ticklish about clarity, I realize, belatedly,  how I had used the word ‘nevertheless’ so poorly. 
 
‘Nevertheless’ is used, when properly, to reassert  a point by acknowledging the existence of counterpoints that are implied elsewhere: Her presentation was dismally poor;  nevertheless her ideas deserve serious considerations.
 
In that sense the  ‘nevertheless’ in my previous post was quite wrong, or at best a foggy version of, say, ‘In any case’ or ‘Regardless.’
 
This ticklishness about words might be dismissively characterized as ‘tight-donkey‘ via translation from ancient scripture.  But of what use are words if you are careless of their proper meanings let alone nuances?
Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online:
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 774

Bob Bridges: 676

Ron Draney: 627

RobertB: 427

Robert: 393

tromboniator: 381

Dick: 377

samaphore: 319

dilettante: 287

Raffee: 238

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 608

Members: 2995

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3138

Posts: 16512

Newest Members: SnoringSnotty, Webbie39, kathy_b, isolda_m, michaelyaziji, bug free, Rach5150, SnoringNotes, reliability bathtub, eslrobert

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 828, Grant Barrett: 1425, EmmettRedd: 635, Glenn: 1600, timfelten: 0