Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
FAQ vs FAQs
Authoritative citation for spelling of the initialism?
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2012/11/09
1:55pm
Geo
New Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
2012/11/09
Offline
1
0

Does anyone have an *authoritative citation* (I'm sure we all have opinion) on the appropriate spelling of the initialism for Frequently Asked Questions?

 

I know the initial use was A) a collection of question*S* (ie, >1), and B) was a single collection. And so the plurality of the questions was subsumed within the TLA.

 

But common usage nowadays is to tack on the pluralizing "s", despite "Questions" already being plural. Has this reached such a critical mass, so as to now being acceptable? (Does AP/Chicago/anyone voice in on this?)

 

Personally, I enjoy this about as much as "ATM machine" (or any of the others), but looking for some pronouncement on the acceptability of this practice.

 

BONUS QUESTION: How does one refer to a collection of collections when the trailing word already has pluralization? Isn't common behavior to drop the second pluralization?? (I can't recall right now.) Or then does that not communicate the higher order collection? So would it be correct to refer to a collection of multiple FAQ as FAQs?

 

If so, how does one pronounce that in non-innitialized form? If anyone says "Frequently Asked Questionses" I'm gonna hafta punch you.

 

Thanks for any help!

PS. Dawns on me typing this that I did call this an initialism, but I think common parlance among teh interwebs n00bs would be to use this as an acronym. [For purposes of discussion, n00b would be defined as anyone joining teh intertubes after Permanent September.] Usage as an acronym I believe thus further reinforces the inclination to append the redundant "s'. 

2012/11/09
2:31pm
Admin
Forum Posts: 619
Member Since:
2007/08/23
Offline
2
0

You might not get much 'authoritive' here, but there are two old threads: RBI" and …RsBI… which discusses plurals in initialisms.

Enjoy.

Emmett

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: Robert
8 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 750

Bob Bridges: 676

Ron Draney: 619

RobertB: 427

tromboniator: 370

Robert: 352

Dick: 350

samaphore: 319

dilettante: 287

Raffee: 238

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 604

Members: 2989

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3084

Posts: 16237

Newest Members: pampmap, Lisbet, holahada, Twisted2014, BMayer, pyrogue, Zednotzee, bensabio, trombone_player, jvallelunga

Moderators: Grant Barrett (1420)

Administrators: Martha Barnette (828), Grant Barrett (1420), EmmettRedd (619), Glenn (1578), timfelten (0)