Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Formal coup
Can you have a formal riot?
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2014/05/23
2:32am
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 439
Member Since:
2011/10/03
Offline
1
0

The BBC says that Thailand’s military decided to have a formal coup.   I  vaguely recall ‘formal war,’  but never ‘formal coup,’  no matter how daily-fares  they are in parts of the world, and certainly never ‘formal riot.’

2014/05/23
10:12am
New River, AZ, USA
Member
Forum Posts: 792
Member Since:
2010/05/18
Offline
2
0

That is an unusual use of “formal” and you’d certainly never hear it used to describe a riot. I am not familiar with the constitution of Thailand, but I do know that some countries have a constitutional provision that allows a military coup to take charge of government functions on a temporary basis, possibly imposing martial law, until a new government can be formally elected. This might be done in the case of wide-spread government corruption, government officials’ deaths by natural disaster, or any number of scenarios that basically neutralize the efficacy of the elected government.

The closest thing we have to that in the US is the Insurrection Act, which allows government troops to act against civilians despite the Posse Comitatis Act. It was only used, to my knowledge, during the LA race riots.

2014/05/23
11:04am
Dick
Fort Worth, TX
Member
Forum Posts: 398
Member Since:
2010/10/19
Offline

A definition of formal is to abide by standards and formalities.  Considering the different ways that coups have taken place, I can imagine one in which the overthrown party gracefully concedes, perhaps without resistance.  This is what I would picture as a formal coup.  Riots on the other hand have no standards or grace attached and obviously there are many coups that are much like riots.

2014/05/23
3:26pm
deaconB
Member
Forum Posts: 297
Member Since:
2013/10/17
Offline
4
0

Heimhenge said
The closest thing we have to that in the US is the Insurrection Act, which allows government troops to act against civilians despite the Posse Comitatis Act. It was only used, to my knowledge, during the LA race riots.

It was used against the WWI Bonus Marchers in 1932, the railroad strikers in 1946. and at Wounded Knee in 1973.  I don’t know if this completes the list or not.  

Dubya wanted to use it after Katrina. but  Kathleen Blanco refused.  They changed the Insurrection Act in 2006 to strip state governments of that right.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: tromboniator
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 792

Bob Bridges: 675

Ron Draney: 633

Robert: 439

RobertB: 423

tromboniator: 400

Dick: 398

samaphore: 312

deaconB: 297

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 608

Members: 2996

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3172

Posts: 16815

Newest Members: Nancy, aerushing, Patzer, brienne77, McInbass, dsouthern36, tjintheville, jamiecordon, Uffda, LisaS

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1425, EmmettRedd: 653, Glenn: 1618, timfelten: 0