Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Given ir Gotten?
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2014/05/27
5:48pm
Avatar
deaconB
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 743
Member Since:
2013/10/18
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

These days, we talk of finance companies giving a mortgage to buyers of  real estate.  In older literature. though, it was the owner that fave the mortgage on his property to the financier.

When did this change?  Did it coincide with the introduction of amortized mortgages?

2014/05/27
7:57pm
Avatar
Dick
Fort Worth, TX
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 446
Member Since:
2010/10/19
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I can’t  answer your question but after looking at a few websites, I am surprised that it is so commonly used improperly.  Some use it properly, though.  People should ask themselves why a lender is called “the mortgage-holder.”  They are holding the mortgage because it was given to them.

2014/05/28
12:22am
Avatar
Robert
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 508
Member Since:
2011/10/03
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I am a little surprised that you both seem to say that   a mortgage is given by the borrower to the bank.

A mortgage arises from a deal in which the borrower is in the supplicant position, not one to give.  I think that neither side is giving anything, and that the banks ‘holds’  in the sense that the borrower is beholden to the new (cut throat) responsibility,  like a father tells a son, I’ll hold you to that.

2014/05/28
2:59am
Avatar
deaconB
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 743
Member Since:
2013/10/18
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Robert said
I am a little surprised that you both seem to say that   a mortgage is given by the borrower to the bank.

A mortgage arises from a deal in which the borrower is in the supplicant position, not one to give.  I think that neither side is giving anything, and that the banks ‘holds’  in the sense that the borrower is beholden to the new (cut throat) responsibility,  like a father tells a son, I’ll hold you to that.

“Give’ is defined here as “transfers ownership” rather than ‘makes a charitable donation”  There is no charity involved.  The borrower gives a mortgage to the lender.  The lender gives money to the borrower. 

Mortgage companies advertise heavily on TV and in thew newspapers, and wine & dine realtors to steer potential borrowers their way.  If you think borrowers are supplicants, the loan officer “smells” that and tries for a higher interest rate.

2014/05/28
8:27am
Avatar
Dick
Fort Worth, TX
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 446
Member Since:
2010/10/19
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Here is a link to The Free Dictionary defining mortgage.  they only define the word and they do it quite properly.  Look at the second paragraph.

I think some people’s mistake comes when they try to use the word “mortgage” the same way as they use the word “loan.”  They are two different things.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/mortgage

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online:
67 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 1060

deaconB: 743

Ron Draney: 713

Bob Bridges: 680

RobertB: 547

Robert: 508

tromboniator: 489

Dick: 446

samaphore: 312

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 611

Members: 3094

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3508

Posts: 18573

Newest Members:

logan, ann_1, cimigreen, emojilover12, emojilover, RuthAnn, scerruti, jefferson23, Nelliott, trialsz63

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1451, EmmettRedd: 825, Glenn: 1719, timfelten: 0