Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Is Rinsate a valid term?
Verifying spelling and word usage.
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2013/02/20
11:57am
Stephen
Washington state
Member
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
2009/10/17
Offline
1
0

My on-line checking of the term “Rinsate” did not provide a clear answer – generally the dictionaries didn’t list it. What do others here think?

Here is how I use it: Rinsate – the effluent from the process of rinsing a container; often containing contaminates. For example, the used gallon jug of pesticide needs to be triple-rinsed and the rinsate collected for proper disposal.

2013/02/20
1:18pm
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1593
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline
2
0

It is a new word to me. As a technical term, it’s not surprising that it might not be found in common dictionaries. I googled it, and found it in a lot of government and education sites and publications. I would consider these sources to be credible.

A search of Google books shows the term used in a number of technical publications:
rinsate

I think you have a winner.

2013/02/20
11:53pm
tromboniator
Alaska
Member
Forum Posts: 385
Member Since:
2009/08/18
Offline

Stephen said
 often containing contaminates

I have never seen contaminates  used as a noun before.

2013/02/21
6:01am
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1593
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline

I think contaminant would be more standard as the noun form. But I can see how, in the context of lots of nominalized words ending in -ate — nouns that are the product of a process (see 3. below) — that contaminate (noun) might pop up from time to time. It could help distinguish between something that contaminates something else, as a source of contamination, the contaminant: “Hydrocarbons are the primary contaminant in this lake.”, versus the final product of contamination, the contaminate (noun), e.g. the lake water, now contaminated by hydrocarbons.

-ate

2. forming nouns a chemical compound, esp a salt or ester of an acid ⇒ “carbonate”, “stearate”
3. forming nouns the product of a process ⇒ “condensate”

-ate suffix

2013/02/21
4:46pm
tromboniator
Alaska
Member
Forum Posts: 385
Member Since:
2009/08/18
Offline
5
0

I agree that it’s useful distinction; I’ve just never encountered it.

2013/02/22
1:46am
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 398
Member Since:
2011/10/03
Offline
6
0

I see both 1st time ever, distinction and contaminate as noun.  I suspect I am not among the minority.

2013/02/22
4:39am
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1593
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline

I can’t say that I’ve ever seen contaminate (noun) before. It does appear to be a technical term, and I’m not in that field.

But this recent focus on the productive suffix -ate to indicate the product of a process does cause me to muse about other -ate words that I have been neglecting to coin:

celebrate: the wreckage after a party. “Can you help me pick up the empty bottles and paper cups and haul all this celebrate out to the curb?”
legislate: the arabesque chaos created by Congress “Only Congress would have the audacity to produce such legislate as the Fiscal Cliff, then applaud themselves for narrowly escaping it.”
inundate: the detritus left after a flood, i.e. grounded flotsam. “Much of Belmar will be closed this Sunday to facilitate the removal of sand and other inundate from the major thoroughfares.”

2013/02/22
11:40am
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 398
Member Since:
2011/10/03
Offline

Now there’s got to be a law.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: Ron Draney
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 777

Bob Bridges: 675

Ron Draney: 627

RobertB: 423

Robert: 398

tromboniator: 385

Dick: 374

samaphore: 312

dilettante: 287

deaconB: 240

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 608

Members: 2962

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3142

Posts: 16550

Newest Members: ritan1, AKMason, CyberSleep, Sam Iam, SnoringSnotty, Webbie39, kathy_b, isolda_m, michaelyaziji, bug free

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1419, EmmettRedd: 633, Glenn: 1593, timfelten: 0