Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
"Survivor" and the Rhetoric of Cancer
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2014/01/04
11:41pm
New Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
2014/01/04
Offline

I took note, while listening to the KHSU stream the afternoon of December 4, that the suggestions for alternatives to “survivor” veered toward militaristic metaphors. How one conceptualizes a cancer diagnosis is of course intensely personal, but the topic is not exactly unknown and seems to have gone unplumbed.

The “war” metaphor in common parlance traces back to Nixon. The “on cancer” part is meaningless, as there is no single disease. A continuing medical education survey (including Sontag reference) can be found here.  A more targeted entry in the literature is to be had here.

Finally, a personal and hostile take has been offered at McSweeney’s.

 

2014/01/05
8:45am
New Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
2014/01/05
Offline
2
0

This is an interesting conversation. After many surgeries and a solution that is working, so far, a suggestion is “veteran.” I’m not sure that we ever “beat” cancer. If “survivor” helps for some, that is fine; whatever it takes to deal with it makes sense.  

2014/01/05
6:35pm
Bob Bridges
USA
Member
Forum Posts: 675
Member Since:
2010/08/14
Offline
3
0

Since the subject has come up, it sounds curmudgeonly to cavil but I have a problem with using the word “hero” in this context.   One may well admire the spirit of the cancer victim, the gusto with which he hangs on to life and maintains a good attitude.   But “heroic” seems to me to dilute still further the proper use of words.   If it’s only going to mean, from now on, a person we think admirable in some way, then don’t we already have plenty of words for that?

It’s gone even further:   Now, because “hero” is so overused, people have to say “true hero” to make the distinction clear—but of course only a week or two intervened until that, too, was applied to people who are simply admirable.   Sigh.

2014/01/05
8:50pm
Dick
Fort Worth, TX
Member
Forum Posts: 397
Member Since:
2010/10/19
Offline
4
0

I totally agree, Bob.   I usually do not fight a change in language or meaning of words, but if this change becomes permanent it will leave true heroes (I don’t know how else to say it.) without a word to describe them.

2014/01/06
5:52am
deaconB
Member
Forum Posts: 296
Member Since:
2013/10/17
Offline
5
0

They’ve been using “survivor” in connection with abuse, especially child sexual abuse, since the 1980s or before.

The idea is that once you start to heal, you’re no longer a victim; you’ve taken ownership of your life once again, and you’re on the road to becoming human again.   Survivors of abuse tend to blame themselves, devalue themselves;;, that’s not entirely true. At some point, some people in 12-step programs graduate from that as an identity. While you’re working hard to recover, it’s useful to think of yourself as a survivor, but eventually, you start describing yourself a a carpenter, a welder, a gardener a golfer, or   a grandfather.

And I imagine   the same is true of those who formerly had cancer. You stop being a cancer patient, you stop being someone who has cancer, you’re someone who used to have it, and lived through it.

In my book, a hero is someone who knowingly risks his health, wealth or safety to help someone in peril, without any duty or compulsion to help.   A lifeguard isn’t a hero for rescuing someone from drowning, but   a nurse would be.   A nurse wouldn’t be a hero for compressing a wound in an HIV patient, but a teamster would be.   And someone who escaped the World Trade Center is a victim if that’s all they’ve done.

 

2014/01/09
5:21am
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 439
Member Since:
2011/10/03
Offline

A most absurd  of warlike metaphors  is that that accuses  your own beleaguered heart.

Obviously many cultures don’t care  for it: (No matter how brief or inaccurate the survey below.)    

(I am sure someone is saying wait till you have one yourself. It’s still absurd.)

 

Spanish                   Attack

French                       Crisis

German                   Infarct

Danish                     Attack

 

Swedish                 Infarct

Norwegian         Infarct

Icelandic               Seizure

Finish                         Situation

 

Armenian             Attack

Russian                   Attack

Polish                         Attack

Hungarian           Attack

 

Arabic: Fit

Persian Infarct

Hebrew                   Attack

 

Somali                     Stop

Swahili                     Shock

Zulu                             Disease

 

Hindi                         Fit

Chinese                   Exhaustion

Vietnamese       Hurt

Thai                             Failure

Japanese               Attack

Korean Paralysis

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online: Glenn, faresomeness
2 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 792

Bob Bridges: 675

Ron Draney: 633

Robert: 439

RobertB: 423

tromboniator: 400

Dick: 397

samaphore: 312

deaconB: 296

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 608

Members: 2996

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3172

Posts: 16813

Newest Members: Nancy, aerushing, Patzer, brienne77, McInbass, dsouthern36, tjintheville, jamiecordon, Uffda, LisaS

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1425, EmmettRedd: 653, Glenn: 1618, timfelten: 0