Discussion Forum

Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
"Survivor" and the Rhetoric of Cancer
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
New Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I took note, while listening to the KHSU stream the afternoon of December 4, that the suggestions for alternatives to “survivor” veered toward militaristic metaphors. How one conceptualizes a cancer diagnosis is of course intensely personal, but the topic is not exactly unknown and seems to have gone unplumbed.

The “war” metaphor in common parlance traces back to Nixon. The “on cancer” part is meaningless, as there is no single disease. A continuing medical education survey (including Sontag reference) can be found here.  A more targeted entry in the literature is to be had here.

Finally, a personal and hostile take has been offered at McSweeney’s.


New Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This is an interesting conversation. After many surgeries and a solution that is working, so far, a suggestion is “veteran.” I’m not sure that we ever “beat” cancer. If “survivor” helps for some, that is fine; whatever it takes to deal with it makes sense.  

Bob Bridges
Forum Posts: 680
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Since the subject has come up, it sounds curmudgeonly to cavil but I have a problem with using the word “hero” in this context.   One may well admire the spirit of the cancer victim, the gusto with which he hangs on to life and maintains a good attitude.   But “heroic” seems to me to dilute still further the proper use of words.   If it’s only going to mean, from now on, a person we think admirable in some way, then don’t we already have plenty of words for that?

It’s gone even further:   Now, because “hero” is so overused, people have to say “true hero” to make the distinction clear—but of course only a week or two intervened until that, too, was applied to people who are simply admirable.   Sigh.

Fort Worth, TX
Forum Posts: 427
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I totally agree, Bob.   I usually do not fight a change in language or meaning of words, but if this change becomes permanent it will leave true heroes (I don’t know how else to say it.) without a word to describe them.

Forum Posts: 571
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

They’ve been using “survivor” in connection with abuse, especially child sexual abuse, since the 1980s or before.

The idea is that once you start to heal, you’re no longer a victim; you’ve taken ownership of your life once again, and you’re on the road to becoming human again.   Survivors of abuse tend to blame themselves, devalue themselves;;, that’s not entirely true. At some point, some people in 12-step programs graduate from that as an identity. While you’re working hard to recover, it’s useful to think of yourself as a survivor, but eventually, you start describing yourself a a carpenter, a welder, a gardener a golfer, or   a grandfather.

And I imagine   the same is true of those who formerly had cancer. You stop being a cancer patient, you stop being someone who has cancer, you’re someone who used to have it, and lived through it.

In my book, a hero is someone who knowingly risks his health, wealth or safety to help someone in peril, without any duty or compulsion to help.   A lifeguard isn’t a hero for rescuing someone from drowning, but   a nurse would be.   A nurse wouldn’t be a hero for compressing a wound in an HIV patient, but a teamster would be.   And someone who escaped the World Trade Center is a victim if that’s all they’ve done.


Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

A most absurd  of warlike metaphors  is that that accuses  your own beleaguered heart.

Obviously many cultures don’t care  for it: (No matter how brief or inaccurate the survey below.)    

(I am sure someone is saying wait till you have one yourself. It’s still absurd.)


Spanish                   Attack

French                       Crisis

German                   Infarct

Danish                     Attack


Swedish                 Infarct

Norwegian         Infarct

Icelandic               Seizure

Finish                         Situation


Armenian             Attack

Russian                   Attack

Polish                         Attack

Hungarian           Attack


Arabic: Fit

Persian Infarct

Hebrew                   Attack


Somali                     Stop

Swahili                     Shock

Zulu                             Disease


Hindi                         Fit

Chinese                   Exhaustion

Vietnamese       Hurt

Thai                             Failure

Japanese               Attack

Korean Paralysis

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online:
25 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 932

Bob Bridges: 680

Ron Draney: 674

deaconB: 571

Robert: 482

RobertB: 478

tromboniator: 441

Dick: 427

samaphore: 312

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 611

Members: 3066

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3370

Posts: 17860

Newest Members: Callipygous, Grabbit.com.pk, uselesscamper, deschepper, endorendil, hermione, rjpatton20022002, The CrimsonChin, Jay in Vermont, yehuda

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1444, EmmettRedd: 763, Glenn: 1713, timfelten: 0