Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search:

— Forum Scope —



— Match —



— Forum Options —




Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
We or they?
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2013/10/23
4:44am
Raffee
Iran
Member
Forum Posts: 235
Member Since:
2012/06/03
Offline
1
0

Hey, after a long time!

Read this quote please: "When those of us who are Christians take part in the Mass or the Holy Communion, we are taking part in a kind of drama, a religious drama… ."

I think either the 'we' implies the author is himself Christian, or it's sloppy writing. Or maybe both? What's your opinion?

BTW, I see no tools of rich text. Have they been eliminated or something's wrong with my browser?

2013/10/23
5:26am
EmmettRedd
Admin
Forum Posts: 604
Member Since:
2007/08/23
Offline
2
0

Raffee said

Hey, after a long time!

Read this quote please: "When those of us who are Christians take part in the Mass or the Holy Communion, we are taking part in a kind of drama, a religious drama… ."

I think either the 'we' implies the author is himself Christian, or it's sloppy writing. Or maybe both? What's your opinion?

BTW, I see no tools of rich text. Have they been eliminated or something's wrong with my browser?

Welcome back, Raffee. I think the 'we' is appropriate, especially since he uses 'us' earlier in the quote.

Emmett

2013/10/23
5:28am
Glenn
Admin
Forum Posts: 1537
Member Since:
2009/03/03
Offline
3
0

I concur that the sentence asserts that the writer is a Christian who takes part in Holy Communion. If that is not so, it is badly written.

It is the "we" that makes it so.

The following rephrase would avoid the assertion.
"Those of us who are Christians and who take part in the Mass or the Holy Communion are taking part in a kind of drama … ."

Although with this rephrase in isolation the "us" leaves room for an implication of inclusion, it is not necessarily so. It is easy to envision a context in which the context would exclude that possibily.

"I am honored to be a Muslim addressing this esteemed assembly. Those of us who are Christians … "

2013/10/23
2:05pm
Robert
Member
Forum Posts: 306
Member Since:
2011/10/03
Offline

I see Raffee's point at top, but for this reason: the mismatching tenses of the verb 'to take' seems to indicate (however only ever so slightly) that the two subjects are not the same.

Conversely, matching tenses, or better, repeated verbs, will strongly indicate that their subjects are same:

When Christians take part in the Mass or the Holy Communion, we do also in a kind of drama, a religious drama…

 

But the  original sentence is actually an idiomatic structure that indicates one activity is implied by the other :

When you vote, you are helping democracy.
When Sue took the city job, she was sacrificing all she had ever known and loved.

Viewed that way, it is clear that the subject is the same person all along.

 

Raffee, I still see the rich text buttons at top of the edit panel. One time my iPad lost them while the IOS was outdated.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 161

Currently Online:
39 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 699

Bob Bridges: 670

Ron Draney: 607

RobertB: 406

tromboniator: 355

Dick: 323

samaphore: 319

Robert: 306

dilettante: 286

Raffee: 235

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 600

Members: 2965

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3010

Posts: 15843

Newest Members: Jeff Axelrod, lethealgia, Lisamm, mcalter, documen, werpknarly, Beffa, rdt2, Afripol, kgraffius

Moderators: Grant Barrett (1411)

Administrators: Martha Barnette (827), Grant Barrett (1411), EmmettRedd (604), Glenn (1537), timfelten (0)