Home » Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
Is Rinsate a valid term?
Guest
1
2013/02/20 - 11:57am

My on-line checking of the term "Rinsate" did not provide a clear answer - generally the dictionaries didn't list it. What do others here think?

Here is how I use it: Rinsate - the effluent from the process of rinsing a container; often containing contaminates. For example, the used gallon jug of pesticide needs to be triple-rinsed and the rinsate collected for proper disposal.

Guest
2
2013/02/20 - 1:18pm

It is a new word to me. As a technical term, it's not surprising that it might not be found in common dictionaries. I googled it, and found it in a lot of government and education sites and publications. I would consider these sources to be credible.

A search of Google books shows the term used in a number of technical publications:
rinsate

I think you have a winner.

Guest
3
2013/02/20 - 11:53pm

Stephen said
often containing contaminates

I have never seen  contaminates    used as a noun before.

Guest
4
2013/02/21 - 6:01am

I think contaminant would be more standard as the noun form. But I can see how, in the context of lots of nominalized words ending in -ate -- nouns that are the product of a process (see 3. below) -- that contaminate (noun) might pop up from time to time. It could help distinguish between something that contaminates something else, as a source of contamination, the contaminant: "Hydrocarbons are the primary contaminant in this lake.", versus the final product of contamination, the contaminate (noun), e.g. the lake water, now contaminated by hydrocarbons.

-ate
...
2. forming nouns a chemical compound, esp a salt or ester of an acid ⇒ "carbonate", "stearate"
3. forming nouns the product of a process ⇒ "condensate"

-ate suffix

Guest
5
2013/02/21 - 4:46pm

I agree that it's useful distinction; I've just never encountered it.

Robert
553 Posts
(Offline)
6
2013/02/22 - 1:46am

I see both 1st time ever, distinction and contaminate as noun. I suspect I am not among the minority.

Guest
7
2013/02/22 - 4:39am

I can't say that I've ever seen contaminate (noun) before. It does appear to be a technical term, and I'm not in that field.

But this recent focus on the productive suffix -ate to indicate the product of a process does cause me to muse about other -ate words that I have been neglecting to coin:

celebrate: the wreckage after a party. "Can you help me pick up the empty bottles and paper cups and haul all this celebrate out to the curb?"
legislate: the arabesque chaos created by Congress "Only Congress would have the audacity to produce such legislate as the Fiscal Cliff, then applaud themselves for narrowly escaping it."
inundate: the detritus left after a flood, i.e. grounded flotsam. "Much of Belmar will be closed this Sunday to facilitate the removal of sand and other inundate from the major thoroughfares."

Robert
553 Posts
(Offline)
8
2013/02/22 - 11:40am

Now there's got to be a law.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
Mike Brock
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1266
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 50
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts