Please consider registering
The forums are currently locked and only available for read-only access. No new posts or comments can be created.
No topic description, material too mystifying!
Forum Posts: 553
The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.
The mystery is nearly complete: what, why, how, who (what kind of mind)? Only known to be from published not joking article in the scholarly journal Diacritics (1997).