Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
guest

Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

The forums are currently locked and only available for read-only access. No new posts or comments can be created.
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Surreply
2014/08/26
5:50am
Avatar
deaconB
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 744
Member Since:
2013/10/18
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The Washington Post currently has a headline “Taking liberties with law and word — a surreply to Rob Weiner”.

None of the standard online dictionaries defines it, although the amateur Wikitionary does, and U.S.Legal defines it as a hyphenated term: Sur-reply is an additional reply to a motion filed after the motion has already been fully briefed. For example, a legal document such as a motion is filed by one party (filing party) requesting the court to enter an order. The other party (responding party) responds to the motion. The filing party then replies to the responding party’s response. Some courts allow the responding party to file a sur-reply to the filing party’s reply to the responding party’s response.

The meaning of sur- is widely understood, and it seems like a useful term.  I predict that this word will explode in popularity, and a Google Watch will prove entertaining.  At least, to those of us whose pulse climbs at seeing grass grow or paint dry.

As for the article itself, when lawyers become language lawyers, it becomes a cross between programmers arguing what the best text editor is,  Bill Clinton explaining that it depends on what the meaning of is is.  I recommend locating a freshly-painted park bench instead.

2014/08/27
5:15pm
Avatar
Peano
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 56
Member Since:
2014/06/03
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline