Discussion Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Contrastive Focus Reduplication Redux
Read the original blog post
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
2012/11/18
6:06am
San Diego, California
Admin
Forum Posts: 1437
Member Since:
2007/08/02
Offline
1
0

When someone’s going for a swim swim, it means they’re doing it for real, laps and all, and not just frolicking. If they’re going to a party, that’s probably going to be less party-like than a party party. These are examples of what linguists call contrastive focus reduplication, in which we emphasize a term, or suggest the purest meaning of a term, by reusing it rather than tacking on another adjective. For example, you might just like someone, but then again you maybe you like like them. This is part of a complete episode.

2012/11/18
9:34am
natatorium
Milwaukee, WI
Member
Forum Posts: 30
Member Since:
2010/09/26
Offline
2
0

“Reduplication” seems redundant redundant. If you duplicate it over again, doesn’t that result in: “swim swim swim”? I suppose linguists will persist in using the word, irregardless  of my post.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 1147

Currently Online:
23 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heimhenge: 835

Bob Bridges: 680

Ron Draney: 642

RobertB: 459

Robert: 445

tromboniator: 422

Dick: 411

deaconB: 375

samaphore: 312

dilettante: 287

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 609

Members: 3035

Moderators: 1

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 3247

Posts: 17190

Newest Members: andrewpaul, jason clarke, hajjr, ken wilbert, f14guy, Superman01, DanGaskell, barkingdogs, Matt, sallymik

Administrators: Martha Barnette: 820, Grant Barrett: 1437, EmmettRedd: 687, Glenn: 1659, timfelten: 0