Few are the words whose origins we know for certain, but “bunk” is one of them. From the mountains of North Carolina to the halls of Congress to everyday language, Martha scoops the skinny:
- Listen on:
- Apple
- Spotify
- Castbox
- + more apps
You must log in to post a comment.
6 comments
More from this show
If you speak a second or third language, you may remember the first time you dreamed in that new tongue. But does this milestone mean...
Do you refer to your dog or cat as “somebody”? As in: When you love somebody that much, you don’t mind if they slobber...
The word filibuster has a long and colorful history, going back to the days when pirates roamed the high seas. Today it refers to hijacking...
Sure, there’s winter, spring, summer, and fall. But the seasons in between have even more poetic names. In Alaska, greenup describes...
Understanding the varieties of conversational styles can mean the difference between feeling you’re understood and being insulted...
Centuries ago, monks who took a vow of silence developed their own hand signs, with hundreds of gestures, that are still in use today...
Good to hear Martha again. An that is no bunk. Did the originators of “All In The Family” use this word in naming the main character Archie “Bunker”? or was it just a ooincidence? and how did Bunk make its way into golfing terminology with the “bunker” word. I find it interesting how a word leads to other words by accident or design? Or both…
James, thank you! Well, it would be nicely Dickensian if arch-conservative Archie Bunker’s name reflected his personality, no? Offhand, I’m not sure how Bunk is used in golfing terminology. Tell me!
Well, you did a good job of debunking Martha, but what of the theory on the web (and now in a book) by Dennis Cassidy that Bunkum really comes from an Irish word Buanchumadh which Cassidy insists is, “(pron. buan’cumah), perpetual invention, endless composition (of a story, poem, or song), a long made-up story, fig. a shaggy dog tale.”
http://www.counterpunch.org/cassidy07012006.html
Personally, I think it’s bunk.
Yes, Jim, that’s the problem with most of Daniel Cassidy’s book. It’s mostly bunk. I have a copy of the book, I’ve seen his theories when they’ve been posted to the email list of the American Dialect Society, and I’ve communicated with him privately. As others have said repeatedly elsewhere, the book is rife with errors, unsubstantiated assumptions, and poor scholarship.
Can I claim didjagoogleit? I’ve googled it. No hits.
It’s astonishing to me that the e-mailers don’t know of the WWII use of the word for the Fuhrer Bunker below the Eagle’s Nest in the Obersaltzburg, the SS Bunker tower, still standing in Munich, the crime-syndicate VP Cheney Bunker in Wyoming.