Home » Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum—A Way with Words, a fun radio show and podcast about language

Discussion Forum (Archived)

Please consider registering
Guest
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
The forums are currently locked and only available for read only access
sp_TopicIcon
Cattle
Guest
21
2015/08/06 - 5:52pm

Knowing many cows (yeah, cows...I lived on a dairy farm) they were referred to in gender as the bull, cow, steer or calf; however, maybe 'bovine' would be a more 'gender neutral' term. 

Guest
22
2015/08/06 - 5:58pm

also bovine was used to keep our words 'clean' ... As in male bovine deification... ?

EmmettRedd
859 Posts
(Offline)
23
2015/08/09 - 2:10pm
Robert
553 Posts
(Offline)
24
2015/08/09 - 4:12pm

I don't see that, Emmett.    Crownover  is correcting people, who might well be few.

Myself, I've yet seen any evidence that  Cattle  with   S   is  increasing.

Well it does spike in the stats, but the volume is still relatively not that significant.

Guest
25
2015/08/10 - 10:30pm

heysuzen said
also bovine was used to keep our words 'clean' ... As in male bovine deification... ?

I like this.  I've used it twice since you posted it.

deaconB
744 Posts
(Offline)
26
2015/08/11 - 8:29am

heysuzen said
also bovine was used to keep our words 'clean' ... As in male bovine deification... ?

I've only heard of "holy cow", not "holy bull"  Maybe you meant defecation?.

Pesident Turman gave a talk to a garden club, and afterwards, the head of the club complained to Bess that Harry had used the term "chicken manure" in his talk, and suggested that Bess could convince him to say "fertilizer" instead.

Oh dear, Bess replied.  You have NO idea how hard it was to get him to say "manure"!

I'm not sure why shit is an "unclean" word.  About 80% of it is gut flora, our microbiome, which is responsible for most of our immunity to disease.

Guest
27
2015/08/14 - 8:07pm

My comment above is based on the assumption that you meant defecation. I chose not to argue about it.

EmmettRedd
859 Posts
(Offline)
28
2015/08/23 - 8:41am

mbaretich said

Cow? No, that's for female cattle. Neat? Archaic! Head of cattle? Too many words.

In another thread, there is a quote of the OxED that says the non-gender specific term for a singular bovine is ox.

Guest
29
2015/08/23 - 5:26pm

Couldn't we avoid this whole singular plural question if we reverted to the Latin? There's a few distinct bovine species, but taking Bos taurus as the example ...

The singular would be: That's a fine looking Bos taurus you have there, Farmer Brown.
And the plural would be: That's a fine herd of Bos tauri you have there, Farmer Brown.

Gender is thus removed from the equation.

deaconB
744 Posts
(Offline)
30
2015/08/23 - 8:13pm

On a game show tonight, the question was "Are there more people or cows in Texas?"

The answer I got but IIRC, the celebrity didn't. is that there are more people.  My reasoning?  Everybody knows a lot of Texans are all hat, no cattle.

But as a backup, I decided that the number of *seers* might approximate the number of people, but only about half of all steers are cows.

Not many bulls, thanks to AI.  Texan politicians must be slingong steershit to their listeners instead of bullshit.

The singular would be: That’s a fine looking Bos taurus you have there, Farmer Brown.
And the plural would be: That’s a fine herd of Bos tauri you have there, Farmer Brown.

Would Farmer Brown be confused by that?  Bossie traditionally refers to a female that has come fresh at least once.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Show Stats
Administrators:
Martha Barnette
Grant Barrett
Moderators:
Grant Barrett
Top Posters:
Newest Members:
Eileen Kosnik
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 1
Topics: 3647
Posts: 18912

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 618
Members: 1267
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Most Users Ever Online: 1147
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 33
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Recent posts